It should set an appropriate limit to the amount of land that can be claimed, (and it will be easier to increase the size of a grant, later, than to reduce it). It should require the settlement to behave by international norms. It should require that the settlement be open to all and prohibit anti-competitive behavior. Regulations could even include protection for sites of historical or other special importance.
It might also be required that only a certain percentage of land sale revenue can be used to repay the cost of establishing the settlement and taken as profit, the balance being retained to support the settlement itself until it can find ways to earn enough to become self sufficient.
Note: The first 25 FAQs below are reprinted from the Space Settlement Initiative website.
What is the real purpose of enacting a Lunar land claims recognition law?
Will promising property rights be enough to produce the necessary investment in developing affordable space transport?
What does international law say about private property ownership in space?
Can there be property ownership without national sovereignty?
What if other nations refuse to recognize land claims in space?
Why not allow smaller, limited land claims for easier steps than settlement?
Could lunar land really be worth enough money to make a difference?
What conditions should the US set for recognition of a claim?
How much land should a settlement be able to claim... and why?
Why must the Earth-Moon space line and settlement be open to all paying passengers regardless of nationality?
Wouldn't it help if a major company announced that, if a land claims recognition law were passed, it would try to develop affordable space transport?
Are the weaknesses and compromises in this plan likely to be permanent?
Didn't the earliest version of this plan talk about Lunar "land grants"? Why aren't you using that phrase any more?
You can't farm Lunar land, and Earth doesn't need the Moon's minerals. So how could Lunar land be put to profitable use?
If you can't give figures, now, proving the profitability of the end uses of Lunar land, how could anyone raise big money for Lunar land?
Could other sources of revenue be enough without land claims recognition?
What if the Lunar settlement does not produce enough operating revenue to pay off its debts and make a profit?
Could the U.S. withdraw from the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, claim national sovereignty on the Moon, then award property rights to whomever it pleased?
What about defense? Does recognizing a land claim obligate the U.S. military to defend the Lunar settlement?
What effect would this have on NASA and the aerospace companies?
The FAQs above cover basic questions about Lunar Land Claims Recognition. The following questions address more advanced issues.
If we really went to the Moon in 1969, why aren't we there now?
What were the assumptions before the Outer Space Treaty, (e.g. Robert Heinlein)?
Could the UN just give every nation a portion of the Moon to own, thereby creating valuable Lunar property rights?
Why don't space activists convince the public to support a government program to establish a base on the Moon and Mars?
Will changing how NASA works bring the taxpayers back on board?
Could this law force the US to recognize a foreign government's Lunar land claim?
Shouldn't we wait to put such a law into effect until free societies are ready to settle the Moon, to keep it from encouraging the Chinese?
Would Article VI of the Outer Space Treaty prohibit Lunar land claims recognition?
|Back from What conditions should the US set... to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)|
Back from What conditions should the US set... to the Space Settlement Institute home page
Every revolutionary idea passes three stages:
- Arthur C. Clarke